From 21ac993da0a187821e812fe7b5b31a426121a546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>

Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 19:10:19 +0100

Subject: [PATCH] Use C99 standard int64_t instead of OCaml defined (and soon

 to go) int64.

---

 libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c | 4 ++--

 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c b/libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c

index 3bb572f..06b3852 100644

--- a/libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c

+++ b/libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ ocaml_libvirt_connect_node_get_free_memory (value connv)

   NONBLOCKING (r = virNodeGetFreeMemory (conn));

   CHECK_ERROR (r == 0, conn, "virNodeGetFreeMemory");

-  rv = caml_copy_int64 ((int64) r);

+  rv = caml_copy_int64 ((int64_t) r);

   CAMLreturn (rv);

 }

@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ ocaml_libvirt_connect_node_get_cells_free_memory (value connv,

   rv = caml_alloc (r, 0);

   for (i = 0; i < r; ++i) {

-    iv = caml_copy_int64 ((int64) freemems[i]);

+    iv = caml_copy_int64 ((int64_t) freemems[i]);

     Store_field (rv, i, iv);

   }

-- 

2.0.4