Репозиторий Sisyphus
Последнее обновление: 11 августа 2020 | Пакетов: 17680 | Посещений: 19031461
en ru br
Майнтейнер: Vitaly Chikunov

 Информация   Пакеты   Bugs and FR  Repocop 

Сообщения от repocop:

пакет статус тест сообщение
bcc-tools-0.15.0-alt2.x86_64
info
uncompressed-manpages Package contains uncompressed manual pages.
bootloader-utils-0.5.3-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
bpftrace-0.11.0-alt2.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file There are file conflicts with the package perf-tools-1.0-alt2.noarch, for example, /usr/share/man/man8/bitesize.8.xz (6 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
bpftrace-0.11.0-alt2.x86_64
info
uncompressed-manpages Package contains uncompressed manual pages.
capnproto-devel-0.6.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
capnproto-libs-0.6.1-alt1.x86_64
info
library-pkgnames package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
cpupower-5.8-alt1.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package cpufrequtils-008-alt3.x86_64, but the package cpufrequtils-008-alt3.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
dm-secdel-1.0.7-alt2.noarch
warn
systemd-but-no-native-init The package have native systemd file(s) but no SysV init scripts.
girar-summary-1.3-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
hddtemp-0.3-alt15.beta15.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/hddtemp: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
ispc-1.14.0-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libbcc-0.15.0-alt2.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
libbcc-0.15.0-alt2.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbcc.so but just /usr/lib64/libbcc.so.0.15.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbcc.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libbcc.so to \%files of libbcc-0.15.0-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test. SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libbcc_bpf.so but just /usr/lib64/libbcc_bpf.so.0.15.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libbcc_bpf.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append ... [the rest of the message is skipped]
libcpupower-devel-5.8-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/include/cpufreq.h conflicts with the package libcpufreq-devel-008-alt3.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
linux-rt-tests-1.8-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/get_cyclictest_snapshot /usr/lib/python3/site-packages/get_cyclictest_snapshot.py
linux-rt-tests-1.8-alt1.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/bin/get_cyclictest_snapshot /usr/lib/python3/site-packages/get_cyclictest_snapshot.py
linux-tools-5.8-alt1.x86_64
warn
altlinux-python-python2-in-spec spec file explicitly calls /usr/bin/python. It is deprecated binary. Use %__python or /usr/bin/python2.
ltp-20200515-alt1.x86_64
fail
unsafe-tmp-usage-in-scripts The test discovered scripts with errors which may be used by a user for damaging important system files. For example if a script uses in its work a temp file which is created in /tmp directory, then every user can create symlinks with the same name (pattern) in this directory in order to destroy or rewrite some system or another user's files. Scripts _must_ _use_ mktemp/tempfile or must use $TMPDIR. mktemp/tempfile is safest. $TMPDIR is safer than /tmp/ because libpam-tmpdir creates a subdirectory of /tmp that is only accessible by that user, and then sets TMPDIR and other variables to that. Hence, it doesn't matter nearly as much if you create a non-random filename, because nobody but you can access it. Found error in /usr/lib/ltp/testcases/bin/sched_stress.sh: $ grep -A5 -B5 /tmp/ /usr/lib/ltp/testcases/bin/sched_stress.sh # their bootfiles other locations. export KERNEL=./sched_datafile touch $KERNEL echo 0.000000 > sch.measure export RAWDEV=`df / | grep dev | awk {'print $1'}` sche... [the rest of the message is skipped]
ocaml-parmap-1.1.1-alt2.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-i586 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/doc/parmap/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/parmap/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/parmap/README.md /usr/share/doc/parmap/odoc-pages/index.mld
ocaml-parmap-1.1.1-alt2.x86_64
info
beehive-log-unpackaged-files-found-x86_64 warning: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/doc/parmap/CHANGES /usr/share/doc/parmap/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/parmap/README.md /usr/share/doc/parmap/odoc-pages/index.mld
ply-2.1.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
ply-2.1.1-alt1.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libply.so but just /usr/lib64/libply.so.0.0.0. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libply.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libply.so to \%files of ply-2.1.1-alt1.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
rpm-build-4.0.4-alt146.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
rr-project-5.3.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/bin/rr conflicts with the package rr-1.3-alt1.qa1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
rtcheck-0.7.7-alt2.x86_64
fail
init-condrestart /etc/rc.d/init.d/rtcheck: missing condrestart target. ERROR: alt-specific script %_sbindir/post_service (used in your %post_service macro) depends on condrestart. Please, fix./etc/rc.d/init.d/rtcheck: missing condstop target. ERROR: alt-specific script %_sbindir/preun_service (used in your %preun_service macro) depends on condstop. Please, fix.
rtcheck-0.7.7-alt2.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
rtcheck-debuginfo-0.7.7-alt2.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
xenomai-3.1-alt1.x86_64
fail
unsafe-tmp-usage-in-scripts The test discovered scripts with errors which may be used by a user for damaging important system files. For example if a script uses in its work a temp file which is created in /tmp directory, then every user can create symlinks with the same name (pattern) in this directory in order to destroy or rewrite some system or another user's files. Scripts _must_ _use_ mktemp/tempfile or must use $TMPDIR. mktemp/tempfile is safest. $TMPDIR is safer than /tmp/ because libpam-tmpdir creates a subdirectory of /tmp that is only accessible by that user, and then sets TMPDIR and other variables to that. Hence, it doesn't matter nearly as much if you create a non-random filename, because nobody but you can access it. Found error in /usr/lib64/xenomai/testsuite/dohell: $ grep -A5 -B5 /tmp/ /usr/lib64/xenomai/testsuite/dohell else echo netcat or nc not found exit 1 fi seq 1 399999 > /tmp/netcat.data ( while :; do cat /tmp/netcat.data; sleep 15; done | $nc $server $port ) & pids="$!" fi if [ -n "$mntp... [the rest of the message is skipped]
 
дизайн и разработка: Vladimir Lettiev aka crux © 2004-2005, Andrew Avramenko aka liks © 2007-2008
текущий майнтейнер: Michael Shigorin