Репозиторий Sisyphus
Последнее обновление: 29 марта 2017 | Пакетов: 17778 | Посещений: 8943165
en ru br
Майнтейнер: Gleb F-Malinovskiy

 Информация   Пакеты   Bugs and FR  Repocop 

Сообщения от repocop:

пакет статус тест сообщение
0ad-0.0.21-alt1.x86_64
warn
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/0ad.desktop: error: key "URL" is present in group "Desktop Entry", but the type is "Application" while this key is only valid for type "Link"
0ad-0.0.21-alt1.i586
warn
altlinux-python-obsolete-buildreq-python-dev python-dev is obsolete according to Python Policy (http://www.altlinux.org/Python_Policy). Please, use BuildRequires: python-devel.
0ad-0.0.21-alt1.x86_64
experimental
iconsdir Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy.
alterator-setup-0.3.1-alt1.noarch
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-file symlink /usr/share/install2/installer-steps is a file in the package installer-distro-backup-server-stage2-6.0-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. symlink /usr/share/install2/installer-steps is a file in the package installer-distro-office-server-stage2-5.0-alt28.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. symlink /usr/share/install2/installer-steps is a file in the package installer-distro-workbench-stage2-5.0-alt2.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. symlink /usr/share/install2/installer-steps is a file in the package installer-office-desktop-stage2-5.0-alt7.noarch. Moreover, the packages h... [the rest of the message is skipped]
alterator-setup-0.3.1-alt1.noarch
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/setup: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
altlinux-release-p8-20160414-alt1.noarch
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package altlinux-release-icarus-20160328-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-backup-server-release-6.0.0-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-centaurus-release-7.0.5-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. File /etc/altlinux-release conflicts with the package branding-altlinux-desktop-release-5.9.9-alt3.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add ... [the rest of the message is skipped]
altlinux-repos-0.7.1-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
apt-conf-branch-8.1.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package apt-conf-sisyphus-7.1.1-alt1.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of apt-conf-sisyphus-7.1.1-alt1.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
apt-conf-sisyphus-7.1.1-alt1.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package apt-conf-branch-8.1.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package apt-conf-branch-8.1.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
asc-2.6.1.0-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
asc-2.6.1.0-alt1.x86_64
info
big-changelog Package contains big ChangeLog. Gzip it.
automake_1.7-1.7.9-alt3.noarch
info
altlinux-policy-tex-buildreq-tetex TeX policy forbids explicit dependencies on obsolete TeTeX. But build dependency on tetex-core is found. Please, replace with TeX-neutral or TexLive dependency.
bash4-devel-4.2.50-alt1.1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file There are file conflicts with the package bash-devel-3.2.57-alt1.x86_64, for example, /usr/include/bash/alias.h (38 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
bash4-examples-4.2.50-alt1.1.noarch
info
unsafe-tmp-usage-in-scripts The test discovered scripts with errors which may be used by a user for damaging important system files. For example if a script uses in its work a temp file which is created in /tmp directory, then every user can create symlinks with the same name (pattern) in this directory in order to destroy or rewrite some system or another user's files. Scripts _must_ _use_ mktemp/tempfile or must use $TMPDIR. mktemp/tempfile is safest. $TMPDIR is safer than /tmp/ because libpam-tmpdir creates a subdirectory of /tmp that is only accessible by that user, and then sets TMPDIR and other variables to that. Hence, it doesn't matter nearly as much if you create a non-random filename, because nobody but you can access it. Found error in /usr/share/doc/bash4-4.2.50/examples/scripts/bcsh.sh: $ grep -A5 -B5 /tmp/ /usr/share/doc/bash4-4.2.50/examples/scripts/bcsh.sh ;; esac trap ':' 2 trap exit 3 trap "tail -n $savehist $histfile>/tmp/hist$$;uniq /tmp/hist$$ > $histfile; rm -f /tmp/*$$;exit 0" 15 getcmd=ye... [the rest of the message is skipped]
binutils-2.27.0-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
binutils-devel-2.27.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
blender-2.78a-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
celestia-common-1.6.1-alt4.qa1.x86_64
warn
altlinux-find-lang-mo Language specific files in /usr/share/locale should be marked, for example, using %find_lang. See http://www.altlinux.org/FindLangPolicy for details.
celestia-common-1.6.1-alt4.qa1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
celestia-common-1.6.1-alt4.qa1.x86_64
info
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/celestia.desktop: hint: value "Qt;KDE;Education;Science;Astronomy;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains more than one main category; application might appear more than once in the application menu
clang-3.8.0-alt1.x86_64
info
library-pkgnames package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
clang-analyzer-3.8.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/share/man/man1/scan-build.1.xz conflicts with the package clang4.0-analyzer-4.0.0-alt1.rel.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
clang-analyzer-3.8.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-file symlink /usr/bin/scan-build is a file in the package clang4.0-analyzer-4.0.0-alt1.rel.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. symlink /usr/bin/scan-view is a file in the package clang4.0-analyzer-4.0.0-alt1.rel.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
clang-debuginfo-3.8.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink value of symlink /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/clang++.debug is different from the same symlink in the package clang4.0-debuginfo-4.0.0-alt1.rel.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
clang-devel-3.8.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file There are file conflicts with the package clang4.0-devel-4.0.0-alt1.rel.x86_64, for example, /usr/include/clang-c/Index.h (269 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
clang-devel-static-3.8.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file There are file conflicts with the package clang4.0-devel-static-4.0.0-alt1.rel.x86_64, for example, /usr/lib64/libclangARCMigrate.a (24 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
cppunit-1.12.1-alt2.svn20130422.1.x86_64
info
library-pkgnames package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
eatmydata-82-alt2.x86_64
info
altlinux-policy-shared-lib-contains-devel-so SharedLibs Policy Draft violation: Shared Lib package should not contain symlink /usr/lib64/libeatmydata.so but just /usr/lib64/libeatmydata.so.1.1.1. According to SharedLibs Policy Draft, symlink /usr/lib64/libeatmydata.so should be placed in a special subpackage named lib-devel. If you have already packaged this symlink in lib-devel, just append \%exclude /usr/lib64/libeatmydata.so to \%files of eatmydata-82-alt2.x86_64. Otherwise, move the symlink into the subpackage lib-devel. There is a known exception for case the .so file is not a shared lib but a plugin that is never directly linked with. Please report such a case to repocop test.
fakechroot-2.19-alt1.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/fakechroot
fb2edit-0.0.9-alt1.x86_64
info
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/fb2edit.desktop: hint: value "Office;FileTools;Qt;Viewer;TextTools;TextEditor;Utility;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains more than one main category; application might appear more than once in the application menu
filezilla-3.24.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility exited abnormally with the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/filezilla.desktop: error: file contains line "?[Desktop Entry]", which is not a comment, a group or an entry /usr/share/applications/filezilla.desktop: error: file contains entry "Name=FileZilla" before the first group, but only comments are accepted before the first group /usr/share/applications/filezilla.desktop: error: file contains entry "GenericName=FTP client" before the first group, but only comments are accepted before the first group /usr/share/applications/filezilla.desktop: error: file contains entry "GenericName[da]=FTP-klient" before the first group, but only comments are accepted before the first group /usr/share/applications/filezilla.desktop: error: file contains entry "GenericName[de]=FTP-Client" before the first group, but only comments are accepted before the first group /usr/share/applications/filezilla.desktop: error: file contains entry "GenericName[fr]=Client FT... [the rest of the message is skipped]
filezilla-3.24.1-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
gcc-c++-common-1.4.20-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc-common-1.4.20-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc-common-debuginfo-1.4.20-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc-fortran-common-1.4.20-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc-gnat-common-1.4.20-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc-go-common-1.4.20-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc-java-common-1.4.20-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc-treelang-common-1.4.20-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc3.4-3.4.5-alt17.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.5-doc-4.5.4-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.5-doc-4.5.4-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.5-doc-4.5.4-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.5-doc-4.5.4-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.5-doc-4.5.4-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.5-doc-4.5.4-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc4.5-doc-4.5.4-alt4.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.5-doc-4.5.4-alt4.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc5-do... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.6-doc-4.6.3-alt11.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.5-d... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc6-doc-6.3.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc6-doc-6.3.... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.7-doc-4.7.2-alt10.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.5-d... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc6-doc-6.3.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc6-doc-6.3.1-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc4.8-doc-4.8.2-alt5.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.5-d... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. The package is obsoleted by the package gcc6-doc-6.3.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc6-doc-6.3.1-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc4.9-doc-4.9.2-alt5.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.5-d... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc6-doc-6.3.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc6-doc-6.3.1-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc5-doc-5.3.1-alt4.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.5-d... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc5-gdb-plugin-5.3.1-alt4.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/lib64/libcc1.so.0.0.0 conflicts with the package gcc6-gdb-plugin-6.3.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
gcc6-doc-6.3.1-alt2.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch, but the package gcc3.4-doc-3.4.5-alt17.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch, but the package gcc4.3-doc-4.3.2-alt20.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch, but the package gcc4.4-doc-4.4.7-alt4.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. The package obsoletes the package gcc4.5-d... [the rest of the message is skipped]
gcc6-gdb-plugin-6.3.1-alt2.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/lib64/libcc1.so.0.0.0 conflicts with the package gcc5-gdb-plugin-5.3.1-alt4.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
glibc-devel-2.24-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file Files /usr/include/rpcsvc/rquota.h /usr/include/rpcsvc/rquota.x conflict with the package quota-devel-4.03-alt1.noarch. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
glibc-gconv-modules-2.24-alt1.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
glibc-timezones-2.24-alt1.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/tzselect
jdkgcj-0.5.13-alt1.x86_64
fail
altlinux-java-forbidden-requires The package has JVM-specific Requires: java-1.5.0-gcj-aot-compile. Those requires are often due to packaging errors and also specifically forbidden by Java Packageing Policy. If you really really need it, write it in more indirect way.
jimtcl-0.76-alt1.x86_64
info
library-pkgnames package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
kavlon-0.13-alt2.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
kernel-headers-common-1.2.5-alt1.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/kheaders: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
kernel-headers-common-1.2.5-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
kernel-headers-common-1.2.5-alt1.x86_64
info
subdir-in-var-run Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
kernel-headers-common-1.2.5-alt1.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/sbin/adjust_kernel_headers
libabigail-1.0-alt0.2.rc2.x86_64
info
big-changelog Package contains big ChangeLog. Gzip it.
libcdparanoia-devel-10.2-alt5.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/include/utils.h conflicts with the package libbcg729-devel-0.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
libedit-devel-3.1.20141030-alt1.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
libgcj-common-1.4.20-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
libgcj4.5-4.5.4-alt4.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
libgcj4.6-4.6.3-alt11.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
libgcj4.7-4.7.2-alt10.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
libgcj4.8-4.8.2-alt5.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
libgcj4.9-4.9.2-alt5.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
libgcj5-5.3.1-alt4.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
libgcj6-6.3.1-alt2.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
libgtest-devel-static-1.7.0-alt1.1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/lib64/libgtest.a conflicts with the package libnss-devel-static-3.30.0-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
libjack-devel-1.9.10-alt2.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libpion-net-static-5.0.7-alt1.git20141017.1.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
libssl-devel-static-1.0.2k-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/lib64/libssl.a conflicts with the package libnss-devel-static-3.30.0-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
libstdc++4.3-devel-4.3.2-alt20.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++4.4-devel-4.4.7-alt4.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++4.5-devel-4.5.4-alt4.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++4.6-devel-4.6.3-alt11.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++4.7-devel-4.7.2-alt10.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++4.8-devel-4.8.2-alt5.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++4.9-devel-4.9.2-alt5.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++5-devel-5.3.1-alt4.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++6-devel-6.3.1-alt2.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
licq-1.8.2-alt1.1.1.i586
experimental
specfile-macros-get_dep-is-deprecated Versioned Requires: foo >= %{get_dep something} using %get_dep and %get_version macros on a library are deprecated by set:versions. You probably should drop %get_dep/%get_version Requires: to avoid RPM database pollution.
licq-kde4-1.8.2-alt1.1.1.x86_64
info
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/kde4/licq.desktop: warning: value "??????? ??????" for key "Comment[ar]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "??????? ??????" of key "GenericName[ar]" /usr/share/applications/kde4/licq.desktop: warning: value "????????? ? ?????? ?????" for key "Comment[bg]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "????????? ? ?????? ?????" of key "GenericName[bg]" /usr/share/applications/kde4/licq.desktop: warning: value "?????????? ??????????" for key "Comment[bn]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "?????????? ??????????" of key "GenericName[bn]" /usr/share/applications/kde4/licq.desktop: warning: value "Instant poruke" for key "Comment[bs]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "Instant poruke" of key "GenericName[bs]" /usr/share/applications/kde4/licq.desktop: warning: value "Missatger a l'instant" for key "Comment[ca]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks red... [the rest of the message is skipped]
licq-qt4-1.8.2-alt1.1.1.x86_64
info
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/licq-qt4.desktop: warning: value "??????? ??????" for key "Comment[ar]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "??????? ??????" of key "GenericName[ar]" /usr/share/applications/licq-qt4.desktop: warning: value "????????? ? ?????? ?????" for key "Comment[bg]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "????????? ? ?????? ?????" of key "GenericName[bg]" /usr/share/applications/licq-qt4.desktop: warning: value "?????????? ??????????" for key "Comment[bn]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "?????????? ??????????" of key "GenericName[bn]" /usr/share/applications/licq-qt4.desktop: warning: value "Instant poruke" for key "Comment[bs]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "Instant poruke" of key "GenericName[bs]" /usr/share/applications/licq-qt4.desktop: warning: value "Missatger a l'instant" for key "Comment[ca]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundan... [the rest of the message is skipped]
liquidwar6-0.6.3902-alt1.1.qa1.x86_64
warn
freedesktop-categories Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/liquidwar6.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt).
liquidwar6-0.6.3902-alt1.1.qa1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
liquidwar6-0.6.3902-alt1.1.qa1.x86_64
info
big-changelog Package contains big ChangeLog. Gzip it.
liquidwar6-0.6.3902-alt1.1.qa1.x86_64
experimental
iconsdir Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy.
llvm-devel-3.8.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file There are file conflicts with the package llvm4.0-devel-4.0.0-alt1.rel.x86_64, for example, /usr/bin/llvm-config (598 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
llvm-devel-static-3.8.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file There are file conflicts with the package llvm4.0-devel-static-4.0.0-alt1.rel.x86_64, for example, /usr/lib64/libLLVMAMDGPUAsmParser.a (53 file conflicts in total). Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
lyx-2.1.4-alt1.i586
warn
altlinux-policy-tex-rpm-build-texmf According to TeX policy (http://www.altlinux.org/TeXPolicy) packages that install files to /usr/share/texmf should BuildRequires(pre): rpm-build-texmf for the dependency magic to work.
lyx-2.1.4-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
lyx-2.1.4-alt1.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/lyxcat
mutt-1.6-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
mygui-3.2.1-alt2.git20140915.1.1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
mygui-3.2.1-alt2.git20140915.1.1.x86_64
experimental
iconsdir Please, move pixmaps from /usr/share/pixmaps to %_liconsdir, %_niconsdir, %_miconsdir according to their size. See http://www.altlinux.org/IconPathsPolicy.
mygui-docs-3.2.1-alt2.git20140915.1.1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
nitrokey-app-0.6.3-alt1.x86_64
info
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/nitrokey-app.desktop: hint: value item "Security" in key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" can be extended with another category among the following categories: Settings, or System
nscd-2.24-alt1.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/nscd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
nscd-2.24-alt1.x86_64
info
subdir-in-var-run Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
ogre-1.9.0-alt1.1.1.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
ogre-1.9.0-alt1.1.1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
ogre-samples-1.9.0-alt1.1.1.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
openct-0.6.20-alt4.x86_64
fail
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/openct: not systemd compatible: lsb init header missing and openct.service is not present. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
openct-0.6.20-alt4.x86_64
warn
systemd-files-in-etc Systemd files Policy Draft violation: etc/tmpfiles.d/ is reserved for sysadmin overrides. Please, move /etc/tmpfiles.d/openct.conf to \%_tmpfilesdir/.
openct-0.6.20-alt4.x86_64
info
subdir-in-var-run Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
openct-0.6.20-alt4.x86_64
info
init-but-no-native-systemd The package have SysV init script(s) but no native systemd files.
openssh-clients-7.2p2-alt2.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /usr/bin/rescp
openssh-server-7.2p2-alt2.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
openssh-server-7.2p2-alt2.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd
python-module-gccjit-0.4.0.5.g541d3a6-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
python-module-gccjit-debuginfo-0.4.0.5.g541d3a6-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
regexxer-0.11-alt1.git20140920.1.x86_64
warn
freedesktop-categories Menu-related Additional Categories (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) not found in /usr/share/applications/regexxer.desktop. Please add it or report a bug against this test if you already have registered one (not including menu unrelated ones as Core or Qt).
rpm-plugin-hdrcache-4.13.0-alt7.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package rpmhdrmemcache-0.1.2-alt3.1.x86_64, but the package rpmhdrmemcache-0.1.2-alt3.1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
rpmrebuild-arepo-3.1.5-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
rpmrebuild-arepo-scripts-3.1.5-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
screen-4.5.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
systemd-files-in-etc Systemd files Policy Draft violation: etc/tmpfiles.d/ is reserved for sysadmin overrides. Please, move /etc/tmpfiles.d/screen.conf to \%_tmpfilesdir/.
screen-4.5.1-alt1.x86_64
info
subdir-in-var-run Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
shellcheck-0.4.5-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
squid-3.5.24-alt1.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/squid: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
squid-3.5.24-alt1.x86_64
info
subdir-in-var-run Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
squid-3.5.24-alt1.x86_64
experimental
checkbashisms checkbashisms utility found possible bashisms in: /etc/rc.d/init.d/squid
squid-doc-3.5.24-alt1.noarch
info
big-changelog Package contains big ChangeLog. Gzip it.
vim-X11-8.0.381-alt1.noarch
info
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Text Editor" for key "Comment" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "Text Editor" of key "GenericName" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "???? ????" for key "Comment[ar]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "???? ????" of key "GenericName[ar]" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Texteditor" for key "Comment[de]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "Texteditor" of key "GenericName[de]" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstredaktilo" for key "Comment[eo]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "Tekstredaktilo" of key "GenericName[eo]" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstiredaktor" for key "Comment[et]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks redundant with value "Tekstiredaktor" of key "GenericName[et]" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: ... [the rest of the message is skipped]
xautolock-2.2-alt1.qa2.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
xautolock-debuginfo-2.2-alt1.qa2.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
xlockmore-5.46-alt2.x86_64
warn
altlinux-find-lang-mo Language specific files in /usr/share/locale should be marked, for example, using %find_lang. See http://www.altlinux.org/FindLangPolicy for details.
 
дизайн и разработка: Vladimir Lettiev aka crux © 2004-2005, Andrew Avramenko aka liks © 2007-2008
текущий майнтейнер: Michael Shigorin