Репозиторий Sisyphus
Последнее обновление: 5 февраля 2023 | Пакетов: 18173 | Посещений: 26644884
en ru br
Майнтейнер: Gleb F-Malinovskiy

 Информация   Пакеты   Bugs and FR  Repocop 

Сообщения от repocop:

пакет статус тест сообщение
altlinux-repos-1.0-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
apt-conf-branch-10.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package apt-conf-sisyphus-10.96-alt1.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of apt-conf-sisyphus-10.96-alt1.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
apt-conf-sisyphus-10.96-alt1.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package apt-conf-branch-10.0-alt1.x86_64, but the package apt-conf-branch-10.0-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
apt-repo-tools-0.8.0-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
apt-repo-tools-debuginfo-0.8.0-alt1.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
arepoize-0.1-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
binutils-2.38-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
binutils-devel-2.38-alt1.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
ddcprobe-3.0-alt1.qa2.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
ddcprobe-debuginfo-3.0-alt1.qa2.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
emelfm2-0.9.0-alt2.x86_64
info
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/emelfm2.desktop: hint: value "System;Utility;Core;FileTools;FileManager;GTK;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains more than one main category; application might appear more than once in the application menu
etcskel-2.0.17-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
gcc10-doc-10.3.1-alt6.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-doc-12.1.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-doc-12.1.1-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc10-doc-10.3.1-alt6.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc9-doc-9.4.1-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc9-doc-9.4.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc10-fortran-doc-10.3.1-alt6.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-fortran-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc10-fortran-doc-10.3.1-alt6.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc9-fortran-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc9-fortran-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc10-gdc-doc-10.3.1-alt6.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc12-gdc-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
gcc10-go-doc-10.3.1-alt6.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-go-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-go-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc10-go-doc-10.3.1-alt6.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc9-go-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc9-go-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc11-doc-11.3.1-alt1.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-doc-12.1.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-doc-12.1.1-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc11-doc-11.3.1-alt1.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc9-doc-9.4.1-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc9-doc-9.4.1-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. ry.
gcc11-fortran-doc-11.3.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-fortran-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc11-fortran-doc-11.3.1-alt1.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc9-fortran-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc9-fortran-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. ry.
gcc11-gdc-doc-11.3.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc9-gdc-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. .
gcc11-go-doc-11.3.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-go-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-go-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc11-go-doc-11.3.1-alt1.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc9-go-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc9-go-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary. ry.
gcc8-doc-8.5.0-alt1.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc9-doc-9.4.1-alt1.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc9-doc-9.4.1-alt1.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag. ag.
gcc8-fortran-doc-8.5.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc9-fortran-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc9-fortran-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag. ag.
gcc8-go-doc-8.5.0-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc9-go-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc9-go-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag. ag.
gcc9-doc-9.4.1-alt1.noarch
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-doc-12.1.1-alt2.noarch, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-doc-12.1.1-alt2.noarch to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc9-doc-9.4.1-alt1.noarch
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc8-doc-8.5.0-alt1.noarch, but the package gcc8-doc-8.5.0-alt1.noarch is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc9-fortran-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-fortran-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-fortran-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc9-fortran-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc8-fortran-doc-8.5.0-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc8-fortran-doc-8.5.0-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
gcc9-gdc-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/share/info/gdc.info.xz conflicts with the package gcc12-gdc-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
gcc9-go-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-package-is-obsoleted The package is obsoleted by the package gcc12-go-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64, but is still alive and in the repository. Consider removing the package, or, if you want the package to be alive, ask the maintainer of gcc12-go-doc-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64 to remove Obsoletes: tag.
gcc9-go-doc-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64
info
rpm-obsolete-live-package The package obsoletes the package gcc8-go-doc-8.5.0-alt1.x86_64, but the package gcc8-go-doc-8.5.0-alt1.x86_64 is still alive and in the repository. Ask its maintainer to remove it, or, if it should not be removed, remove the Obsoletes: tag. Do not forget to add explicit conflicts with the other package if nessessary.
ghc8.6.4-8.6.4-alt8.qa1.x86_64
info
library-pkgnames package contains public library which is used in external packages: name should be lib* according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs
ghc8.6.4-doc-8.6.4-alt8.qa1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-consists-of-usr-share The package consists of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
glibc-gconv-modules-2.35.0.6.491f2e-alt2.x86_64
warn
file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile Files below /usr may not be marked as conffiles, since /usr might be mounted read-only and thus, the local system administrator would not have a chance to modify this configuration file.
glibc-locales-2.35.0.6.491f2e-alt2.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
img-build-0.1.0-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
libgdb-devel-11.2-alt1.x86_64
warn
library-pkgnames-static package contains static library which has the same name as a shared library in the repository, but neither package name ends with -devel-static according to http://altlinux.org/Drafts/SharedLibs nor the package explicitly conflicts with the package with .so library
libgphobos10-devel-10.3.1-alt6.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/lib64/libgphobos.spec conflicts with the package libgphobos9-devel-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. .
libgphobos11-devel-11.3.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/lib64/libgphobos.spec conflicts with the package libgphobos9-devel-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives. .
libgphobos9-devel-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-file-file File /usr/lib64/libgphobos.spec conflicts with the package libgphobos12-devel-12.1.1-alt2.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
libstdc++10-devel-10.3.1-alt6.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++11-devel-11.3.1-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++8-devel-8.5.0-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
libstdc++9-devel-9.4.1-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
make-initrd-netboot-0.4.4-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
make-initrd-pipeline-stateless-0.1-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
mki-build-0.1.0-alt1.noarch
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
mutt-2.1.1.0.3.g6c0f75cca-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
nmap-7.80-alt2.src
warn
specfile-useradd-n -n in useradd is compat option and can be removed any time. Use -N instead.
nmap-7.80-alt2.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
nscd-2.35.0.6.491f2e-alt2.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/nscd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
nscd-2.35.0.6.491f2e-alt2.x86_64
info
subdir-in-var-run Found a subdir in /var/run or /var/lock. /var/run and /var/lock may be mounted as temporary filesystems, so the init.d scripts must handle this correctly. This will typically amount to creating any required subdirectories dynamically when the init.d script is run, rather than including them in the package and relying on rpm to create them.
openssh-8.6p1-alt3.src
warn
specfile-useradd-n -n in useradd is compat option and can be removed any time. Use -N instead.
openssh-gostcrypto-8.6p1-alt2.gost.src
warn
specfile-useradd-n -n in useradd is compat option and can be removed any time. Use -N instead.
openssh-server-8.6p1-alt3.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
openssh-server-gostcrypto-8.6p1-alt2.gost.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/sshd: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
postfix-3.6.6-alt1.x86_64
warn
init-lsb /etc/rc.d/init.d/postfix: lsb init header missing. See http://www.altlinux.org/Services_Policy for details.
postfix-3.6.6-alt1.src
warn
specfile-useradd-n -n in useradd is compat option and can be removed any time. Use -N instead.
purple-plugin-bot-sentry-1.1.0-alt3.qa3.x86_64
warn
altlinux-find-lang-mo Language specific files in /usr/share/locale should be marked, for example, using %find_lang. See http://www.altlinux.org/FindLangPolicy for details.
qmapshack-1.16.0-alt1.x86_64
info
arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data in /usr/share, while it is an architecture-dependent package. This is wasteful of mirror space and bandwidth, as we then end up with multiple copies of this data, one for each architecture. If the data in /usr/share is not architecture-independent, it is a policy violation, and in this case, you should move that data elsewhere.
routino-doc-3.3.3-alt1.noarch
info
big-changelog Package contains big ChangeLog. Gzip it.
vim-X11-9.0.1240-alt1.noarch
info
freedesktop-desktop desktop-file-validate utility printed the following message(s): /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Text Editor" for key "Comment" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "???? ????" for key "Comment[ar]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[ar]" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Texteditor" for key "Comment[de]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[de]" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstredaktilo" for key "Comment[eo]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[eo]" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Tekstiredaktor" for key "Comment[et]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same as that of key "GenericName[et]" /usr/share/applications/gvim.desktop: warning: value "Testu Editorea" for key "Comment[eu]" in group "Desktop Entry" looks the same... [the rest of the message is skipped]
vim-common-9.0.1240-alt1.noarch
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-symlink value of symlink /usr/share/man/man1/view.1.xz is different from the same symlink in the package vi-traditional-4.1.3-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
vim-common-9.0.1240-alt1.noarch
warn
rpm-filesystem-conflict-symlink-file symlink /usr/share/man/man1/ex.1.xz is a file in the package vi-traditional-4.1.3-alt1.x86_64. Moreover, the packages have no explicit conflicts with each other. You should add explicit conflicts, or, if conflicts are avoidable, consider using alternatives.
xorg-apps-7.8-alt9.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
xorg-drv-input-7.8-alt9.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
xorg-drv-video-7.8-alt9.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
xorg-utils-7.8-alt9.x86_64
info
missing-url Missing Url: in a package.
 
дизайн и разработка: Vladimir Lettiev aka crux © 2004-2005, Andrew Avramenko aka liks © 2007-2008
текущий майнтейнер: Michael Shigorin